Criticism of Human Rights Watch

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Criticism of Human Rights Watch

Quality:

Article “Criticism of Human Rights Watch” in English Wikipedia has 69.6 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 113 references and 17 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 3.67 points.

This article has the best quality in Ukrainian Wikipedia. However, this article is the most popular in English version.

In June 2025 the article “Criticism of Human Rights Watch” was edited by 1 authors in English Wikipedia and written by 2 authors in all languages.

Since the creation of article “Criticism of Human Rights Watch”, its content was written by 241 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 256 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 7 times in English Wikipedia and cited 18 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #7501 in August 2009
  • Global: #46688 in August 2009

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #112295 in May 2021
  • Global: #207466 in October 2023

There are 5 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1Ukrainian (uk)
Критика Human Rights Watch
72.2602
2English (en)
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
69.6366
3Arabic (ar)
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
31.2809
4Persian (fa)
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
24.7653
5Chinese (zh)
对人权观察组织的批评
23.4447
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Criticism of Human Rights Watch" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
419 824
2Arabic (ar)
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
5 451
3Chinese (zh)
对人权观察组织的批评
1 486
4Persian (fa)
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
1 018
5Ukrainian (uk)
Критика Human Rights Watch
348
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Criticism of Human Rights Watch" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
1 629
2Chinese (zh)
对人权观察组织的批评
42
3Arabic (ar)
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
31
4Persian (fa)
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
15
5Ukrainian (uk)
Критика Human Rights Watch
11
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Criticism of Human Rights Watch" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
241
2Ukrainian (uk)
Критика Human Rights Watch
6
3Arabic (ar)
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
4
4Chinese (zh)
对人权观察组织的批评
3
5Persian (fa)
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
2
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Criticism of Human Rights Watch" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
1
2Ukrainian (uk)
Критика Human Rights Watch
1
3Arabic (ar)
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
0
4Persian (fa)
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
0
5Chinese (zh)
对人权观察组织的批评
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Criticism of Human Rights Watch" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
7
2Arabic (ar)
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
4
3Persian (fa)
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
4
4Ukrainian (uk)
Критика Human Rights Watch
2
5Chinese (zh)
对人权观察组织的批评
1
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
انتقادات هيومن رايتس ووتش
enEnglish
Criticism of Human Rights Watch
faPersian
نقد دیده‌بان حقوق بشر
ukUkrainian
Критика Human Rights Watch
zhChinese
对人权观察组织的批评

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#112295
05.2021
Global:
#207466
10.2023

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#7501
08.2009
Global:
#46688
08.2009

Local AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 10 February 2026

On 10 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Ilia Malinin, Bad Bunny, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Jutta Leerdam, Jake Paul, Puerto Rico, Little Saint James.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Bad Bunny, Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Savannah Guthrie, Ghislaine Maxwell, 2026 Winter Olympics, List of Super Bowl halftime shows, Eileen Gu, Jutta Leerdam.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information